Participation · Multilateral Development Organisations · Shared Standards

What could shared standards unlock for the economies you serve?

Capacity-building produces skilled professionals. Shared standards could let their judgment be verified, referenced and traded across borders. The Trust Ledger Project is mapping what that could mean for development outcomes and global economic participation.

— 01. The untapped potential

Where could shared standards change economic participation?

Verifiable judgment lets capability cross borders.

Exportable capability. Professionals trained with development support could sell accountable judgment to the world, not only to local markets.
Lower cost of verification. Shared reference points could reduce the effort portfolios spend confirming what is real at the point of use.
A common basis for cooperation. Institutions that use the same reference points can rely on one another’s evidence.
Reference positions. In earlier transitions, the economies and funders that anchored a container early held reference positions for decades.

Consider: a portfolio of skills programmes across several countries. What if each graduate’s judgment carried provenance and accountability that buyers anywhere could verify?

Evidence class: future possibility. This is a hypothesis we are testing. The reference points that could be shared across institutions are an open design question.

History tip · who moved early

Container sizes were fixed in 1968, and ports began reporting traffic in a shared unit. A common measure let ports be compared, funded and planned against each other.

Next: what support could look like →

— 02. Three questions

Which three questions do we work through together?

Enter, do, ship out. Three questions, one conversation.

Question 1 · Enter

How do institutions enter?

Map where evidence and reporting standards differ across partners.
Identify which reference points could be shared.
Examine where verification costs sit in current portfolios.

Question 2 · Do

What could they do once there?

Examine how shared standards could open global markets to the capability being built.
Explore cross-border cooperation on how judgment is traced and referenced.
Consider effects on growth, trade in services and strategy.

Question 3 · Ship out

What should travel, and under what conditions?

Decide which evidence and professional judgment should travel between institutions.
Set conditions for attribution and accountability.
Agree safeguards for the communities the evidence describes.

The Trust Ledger Project goes ahead into the reconfigured Information Market, so you can decide whether and how to take part.

Forms of participation we can examine together:

Convening standard-setting across partner institutions.
Co-funding pilots in a shared priority sector.
Aligning programme evidence requirements around common reference points.
Sharing lessons across portfolios.

Evidence class: working framework. These are possibilities to discuss, not commitments.

— 03. The first conversation

What does a first conversation involve?

A shared question, not a commitment.

It is

A conversation about questions

A discussion of questions, possibilities and evidence.
A chance to test whether the questions matter to your work.
A first look at what we have published and what we are still testing.

It is not

A request for anything up front

Not a request to accept a particular theory.
Not a request for confidential information.
Not a commitment to collaborate before trust is established.

We share unpublished work only in appropriate conversations.

— Participation

Where might your institution contribute?

Four ways in. Start a conversation where your experience fits.

The Trust Ledger Project is being developed through research, dialogue and practical examination. We invite institutions and individuals with relevant experience to discuss the questions, possibilities and evidence that may shape its development.

Sovereign Institutions

Start a Conversation →