Standards
How standards support trust — and how they should be developed.
The Core Argument
Standards are the invisible infrastructure of trust. They create shared expectations, enable interoperability, and support accountability.
The shipping container taught us that standards are essential for moving value at scale. Without standardised containers, global trade would be slow, costly, and unreliable.
The same is true for trust infrastructure. Without standards for judgment, trust, and context, the Judgment Economy will be fragmented and inefficient.
Standards are the foundation of scalable trust.
How Standards Support Trust
The functions of standards.
Shared expectations
Standards create shared expectations. Everyone knows what is expected — and what to expect from others.
Interoperability
Standards enable interoperability. They allow different systems, institutions, and people to work together seamlessly.
Accountability
Standards enable accountability. They create clear expectations that can be monitored and enforced.
Scalability
Standards enable scalability. They provide a common framework that can be applied across contexts.
The Acacia perspective:
Standards are not restrictions. They are enablers. They make trust possible at scale.
Types of Standards
The standards needed for trust infrastructure.
Standards for judgment
What does good judgment look like? How is it evaluated? How is it trusted? These standards define the quality of judgment.
Standards for trust
What makes someone or something trustworthy? How is trust measured? How is it verified? These standards define trustworthiness.
Standards for context
What context is needed? How is it documented? How is it transferred? These standards define the container for intelligence.
Standards for accountability
Who is accountable? How is accountability tracked? What are the consequences of failure? These standards define responsibility.
Key insight:
These standards are interconnected. Standards for judgment depend on standards for context. Standards for trust depend on standards for accountability. They must be developed together.
Developing Standards
How standards should be developed.
Evidence-based
Standards should be based on evidence, not opinion. They should draw on research, case studies, and practical experience.
Collaborative
Standards should be developed collaboratively. They should involve stakeholders from across the ecosystem — practitioners, researchers, policymakers.
Iterative
Standards should be iterative. They should evolve as we learn more, as the environment changes, and as new challenges emerge.
Open and accessible
Standards should be open and accessible. Anyone should be able to use them, adapt them, and contribute to them.
The Acacia perspective:
Standards are not imposed from above. They are developed collaboratively, grounded in evidence, and refined through practice. This is how they gain legitimacy and trust.
Reading path: